The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Discourse on Standardization: Public or Private?
Abstract
The preceding chapter examined the history, structure, and practices of the principal international standards-setting organizations, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), with particular attention to their composition, the public/private nature of their organizations, the interests they serve, and their processes. The present chapter will examine current discourse on standardization and the rise of the consortia movement. It will do so first by framing the debate within general structural and openness issues and then by looking at specific rhetorical examples of arguments, claims, and controversies. It will then establish a taxonomy of arguments and rhetorical discourses, focusing on the issue of legitimation of consortia standardization. It will next analyze several important cases, looking at public documents, testimony, and reports. In doing so, it will examine the specific claims to legitimacy made by consortia and traditional bodies. It will seek to clarify how the practice of standardization is being discursively re-constructed. Finally it will consider international, institutional, and industrial responses to these claims of legitimacy and to the political/economic pressures they have brought.
Related Content
|
Jeff Mangers, Christof Oberhausen, Meysam Minoufekr, Peter Plapper.
© 2020.
26 pages.
|
|
Sylvain Maechler, Jean-Christophe Graz.
© 2020.
27 pages.
|
|
Sabrina Petersohn, Sophie Biesenbender, Christoph Thiedig.
© 2020.
41 pages.
|
|
Jonas Lundsten, Jesper Mayntz Paasch.
© 2020.
21 pages.
|
|
Justus Alexander Baron.
© 2020.
31 pages.
|
|
Vasileios Mavroeidis, Petros E. Maravelakis, Katarzyna Tarnawska.
© 2020.
19 pages.
|
|
Hiam Serhan, Doudja Saïdi-Kabeche.
© 2020.
30 pages.
|
|
|