Correlating Resonance: Configurational Analysis, Neutrosophy, and Wickedness

View Sample PDF

Author(s): Geoff Brian Ebbs (Griffith University, Australia), Louis Sanzogni (Griffith University, Australia)and Luke Houghton (Griffith University, Australia)
Copyright: 2025
Pages: 28
Source title: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Models and Techniques: Neutrosophic Approaches
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Mohamed Abdel-Basset (Zagazig University, Egypt), Abduallah Gamal (Zagazig University, Egypt)and Florentin Smarandache (University of New Mexico, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2085-3.ch011

Keywords: Decision Support Systems / Engineering Science Reference / Fuzzy Systems / Knowledge Management and Library Science

Purchase

View Correlating Resonance: Configurational Analysis, Neutrosophy, and Wickedness on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The complex problems facing the world today resist solutions. The reasons are the complex, multidisciplinary, interdependent variables, and the non-optimal behaviour of stakeholders that lead to unsolvable “wicked” problems. Analysis of these complex situations requires methodologies that can deal with this complex, incomplete, and inconsistent data. Neutrosophy has evolved specifically to deal with the indeterminate nature of such data. Some researchers have considered both configurational analysis and neutrosophy. Neutrosophy examines the neutralities and the interplays between opposites whereas configurational analysis isolates the neutralities and focuses on the interplay between opposites. This chapter examines a configurational approach that is simple and arithmetic in nature and does not preclude a focus on the neutralities, so is compatible with neutrosophic logic, statistics, and probability analysis.

The IRMA Community

Research IRM

Correlating Resonance: Configurational Analysis, Neutrosophy, and Wickedness

Purchase

Abstract

Related Content

IRMA Sponsors