IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Collaborative Production, the Knowledge Commons and the Application of Open Content Licenses

Collaborative Production, the Knowledge Commons and the Application of Open Content Licenses
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Natalie Pang (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 24
Source title: Information Technology for Intellectual Property Protection: Interdisciplinary Advancements
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Hideyasu Sasaki (Ritsumeikan University, Japan)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-135-1.ch009

Purchase

View Collaborative Production, the Knowledge Commons and the Application of Open Content Licenses on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

In recent years impacts of information and communication technologies, market enclosures, and the opposing struggle to retain community and public goods have had significant impacts on the social interactions of communities. This chapter examines communities in the context of the knowledge commons – a space by which “a particular type of freedom” (Benkler, 2004) can be practised. It also provides an appropriate lexicon to the examination and discourse of communities and the ways they work. As Castells (2003) notes, self-knowledge “is always a construction no matter how much it feels like a discovery” –this construction is enabled when people work or associate themselves with each other. In particular, the chapter is concerned about the structure of open content licenses operating within such domains. The chapter first explores the concept of the knowledge commons to understand the types of intellectual property that are distinctive to communities (public, communal, and private). Thereafter, licenses as a structure are examined as they may apply within such contexts. A significant influence on the discussion is the contemporary media environment that communities operate in today, resulting in the breaking down of boundaries, the blurring of distinctions between an original and a copy, and shifting the nature of production in communities. These debates lead to a case for open content licenses as an appropriate structural mechanism for communities.

Related Content

Jeff Mangers, Christof Oberhausen, Meysam Minoufekr, Peter Plapper. © 2020. 26 pages.
Sylvain Maechler, Jean-Christophe Graz. © 2020. 27 pages.
Sabrina Petersohn, Sophie Biesenbender, Christoph Thiedig. © 2020. 41 pages.
Jonas Lundsten, Jesper Mayntz Paasch. © 2020. 21 pages.
Justus Alexander Baron. © 2020. 31 pages.
Vasileios Mavroeidis, Petros E. Maravelakis, Katarzyna Tarnawska. © 2020. 19 pages.
Hiam Serhan, Doudja Saïdi-Kabeche. © 2020. 30 pages.
Body Bottom