The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
An Ergonomic Compatibility Perspective on the Selection of Advanced Manufacturing Technology: A Case Study for CNC Vertical Machining Centers
|
Author(s): Aidé Aracely Maldonado-Macías (Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Mexico), Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz (Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Mexico), Juan Luis Hernández-Arellano (Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Mexico)and Guillermo Cortes-Robles (Instituto Tecnológico de Orizaba, Mexico)
Copyright: 2016
Pages: 29
Source title:
Handbook of Research on Managerial Strategies for Achieving Optimal Performance in Industrial Processes
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Giner Alor-Hernández (Instituto Tecnológico de Orizaba, Mexico), Cuauhtémoc Sánchez-Ramírez (Instituto Tecnológico de Orizaba, Mexico)and Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz (Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Mexico)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0130-5.ch008
Purchase
|
Abstract
Evaluation and Selection of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT) is a complex problem involving multiple attributes difficult to consider in their entirety. The Axiomatic Design Theory have been used successfully to solve this problem. This chapter presents a literature review for applications of Axiomatic Design Theory in decision making and develops an Ergonomic Compatibility Evaluation Perspective case study for the selection of two vertical CNC machining centers. A new Hierarchical Fuzzy Axiomatic Design methodology was used as a decision aid for evaluation of technology in a more complete manner, while considering human factors and ergonomics aspects neglected in actual AMT evaluation and selection models. Methodology for the data analysis is described. A group of three experts was conformed for the case study. 26 articles were organized in a data matrix. The alternative which best meet established Design Ranges in terms of Ergonomic Compatibility was selected among two alternatives, according to the Ergonomic Incompatibility Content (EIC) in a fuzzy environment.
Related Content
Sandhya Avasthi, Tanushree Sanwal, Shivani Sharma, Shweta Roy.
© 2023.
23 pages.
|
Subha Karumban, Shouvik Sanyal, Madan Mohan Laddunuri, Vijayan Dhanasingh Sivalinga, Vidhya Shanmugam, Vijay Bose, Mahesh B. N., Ramakrishna Narasimhaiah, Dhanabalan Thangam, Satheesh Pandian Murugan.
© 2023.
17 pages.
|
Aditya Saxena, Devansh Chauhan, Shilpi Sharma.
© 2023.
26 pages.
|
Eduardo José Villegas-Jaramillo, Mauricio Orozco-Alzate.
© 2023.
33 pages.
|
Revathi A., Poonguzhali S..
© 2023.
18 pages.
|
Indu Malik, Anurag Singh Baghel.
© 2023.
18 pages.
|
Shanu Sharma, Tushar Chand Kapoor, Misha Kakkar, Rishi Kumar.
© 2023.
24 pages.
|
|
|