IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

A Comparison between International Trade and R&D Collaboration Networks in the European Aerospace Sector

A Comparison between International Trade and R&D Collaboration Networks in the European Aerospace Sector
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Pier Paolo Angelini (Interuniversity Research Centre for Sustainable Development (CIRPS), Italy)and Lucio Biggiero (University of L'Aquila, Italy & CIRPS, Italy)
Copyright: 2016
Pages: 29
Source title: International Business: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-9814-7.ch049

Purchase

View A Comparison between International Trade and R&D Collaboration Networks in the European Aerospace Sector on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Do trading countries also collaborate in R&D? This is the question that, facing with a number of methodological problems, here it is dealt with. Studying and comparing the international trade network and the R&D collaboration network of European countries in the aerospace sector, social network analysis offers a wide spectrum of methods and criteria either to make them comparable or to evaluate its similarity. International trade is a 1-mode directed and valued network, while the EU-subsidized R&D collaboration is an affiliation (2-mode) undirected and unvalued network, and the elementary units of this latter are organizations and not countries. Therefore, to the aim to make these two networks comparable, this paper shows and discusses a number of methodological problems and solutions offered to solve them, and provides a multi-faceted comparison in terms of various statistical and topological indicators. A comparative analysis of the two networks structures is made at aggregate and disaggregate level, and it is shown that the common centralization index is definitively inappropriate and misleading when applied to multi-centered networks like these, and especially to the R&D collaboration network. The final conclusion is that the two networks resemble in some important aspects, but differ in some minor traits. In particular, they are both shaped in a core-periphery structure, and in both cases important countries tend to exchange or collaborate more with marginal countries than between themselves.

Related Content

Monia Ben Ltaifa, Walid Chouari, Abdelkader Mohamed Sghaier Derbali. © 2024. 30 pages.
Filiz Mızrak. © 2024. 21 pages.
Aytaç Gökmen. © 2024. 12 pages.
Maria Aweis Mayow, Aytaç Gökmen, Dilek Temiz. © 2024. 27 pages.
Ahlem Baccouche, Houssem Bouzgarrou, Meriem Jouirou, Moufida Ben Saada. © 2024. 21 pages.
Ashwani Panesar, Rohit Sood. © 2024. 20 pages.
Boussairi Slimani, Moufida Ben Saada, Sameh Halaoua. © 2024. 22 pages.
Body Bottom