Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

A Case Study of Distance Education for Informatics Gifted Students

A Case Study of Distance Education for Informatics Gifted Students
View Sample PDF
Author(s): JeongWon Choi (Korea National University of Education, Korea), SangJin An (Korea National University of Education, Korea) and YoungJun Lee (Korea National University of Education, Korea)
Copyright: 2015
Pages: 23
Source title: Cases on Instructional Technology in Gifted and Talented Education
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Lesia Lennex (Morehead State University, USA) and Kimberely Fletcher Nettleton (Morehead State University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6489-0.ch017


View A Case Study of Distance Education for Informatics Gifted Students on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.


This chapter analyzes cases in which programming was developed via e-learning in informatics gifted classes in Korea. The gifted class, which aimed to improve computational thinking and problem-solving ability, received the algorithm and programming education and experienced the design and implementation process of a programming project entitled “Interactive Movie Production through Scratch Programming” through the creation of a learning group. The learners received gifted education via e-learning systems, such as video lecturing, video conferencing, and smart phones. However, there was much difficulty in providing appropriate feedback and scaffolding to resolve the trial-and-error issues experienced during the programming learning process, which involved learning flow interruptions of the learners, which in some cases caused them to give up on the learning process. To overcome this difficulty, the selection of educational content appropriate for distance learning was regarded as important, and algorithm learning utilizing puzzles was proposed as an alternative. Puzzles can encompass learning content using texts and images while also providing feedback and scaffolding appropriate for learners via suitable learning document compositions and descriptions of the problem solving process while also evaluating the learner's ability in detail.

Related Content

Johnny R. O'Connor. © 2020. 6 pages.
Pam Epler. © 2020. 17 pages.
Sharon Wilbur, Sharon Dean, Stephanie Hyder, Brandy Peters, Christiana Horn. © 2020. 14 pages.
Cameron Hauseman. © 2020. 15 pages.
Yanira Oliveras-Ortiz, Wesley D. Hickey, Jennifer S. Jones. © 2020. 12 pages.
Gary L. Ackerman. © 2020. 17 pages.
Joseph Ezale Cobbinah. © 2020. 12 pages.
Body Bottom