IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Optimizing Stock Portfolio Using the Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Assessing PSO and Other Algorithms

Optimizing Stock Portfolio Using the Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Assessing PSO and Other Algorithms
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Samaneh Mohammadi Jarchelou (Department of Statistics, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran), Kianoush Fathi Vajargah (Department of Statistics, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran)and Parvin Azhdari (Department of Statistics, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran)
Copyright: 2024
Volume: 15
Issue: 1
Pages: 13
Source title: International Journal of Applied Metaheuristic Computing (IJAMC)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Peng-Yeng Yin (Ming Chuan University, Taiwan)
DOI: 10.4018/IJAMC.362001

Purchase


Abstract

When it comes to making financial decisions, choosing stocks is crucial to building a successful portfolio. Stocks are evaluated according to lower risk, and the best stocks are chosen to produce assets that are then utilized to construct the portfolio. In this study, we have compared the integrated particle swarm method to four other algorithms for stock selection and optimization: the genetic algorithm, the Pareto search algorithm, the pattern search algorithm, and quadratic programming in the Matlab toolbox. Six particular stock firms are taken into consideration for this reason during a given time period. First, we will use the aforementioned Matlab toolbox techniques to conduct Markowitz's mean variance model. Additionally, the usual embedded particle swarm methodology and the penalty function approach will be used to create this model. The difference between the averages at ten distinct levels of predicted values will be examined in the next research based on the returns in the chosen portfolios. Statistical tests will be employed to differentiate noteworthy distinctions between the suggested approach and the alternative algorithms. MSC: 65K10,91B05.

Related Content

Niusha Yaghini, Mir Yasin Seyed Valizadeh. © 2024. 23 pages.
Sana Alyaseri, Andy Conner. © 2024. 30 pages.
Abid Sabrina, Debbat Fatima. © 2024. 20 pages.
Samaneh Mohammadi Jarchelou, Kianoush Fathi Vajargah, Parvin Azhdari. © 2024. 13 pages.
Maryam AlJame, Aisha Alnoori, Mohammad G. Alfailakawi, Imtiaz Ahmad. © 2023. 27 pages.
Trust Tawanda, Philimon Nyamugure, Elias Munapo, Santosh Kumar. © 2023. 16 pages.
Sajad Ahmad Rather, P. Shanthi Bala. © 2022. 39 pages.
Body Bottom