Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Global Governance of Science: Wishful Thinking or a Life Necessity?

Global Governance of Science: Wishful Thinking or a Life Necessity?
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Yury Nikolayevich Sayamov (UNESCO Chair on Global Problems and Emerging Social and Ethical Challenges for Large Cities and Their Population, Faculty of Global Processes, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia)
Copyright: 2015
Volume: 5
Issue: 2
Pages: 12
Source title: International Journal of Technology and Educational Marketing (IJTEM)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Purnendu Tripathi (IGNOU, India) and Siran Mukerji (IGNOU, India)
DOI: 10.4018/IJTEM.2015070103


View Global Governance of Science: Wishful Thinking or a Life Necessity? on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.


The article draws attention to the role of education technologies within the entire issue of the global governance of science considered here to be of growing importance for the present world development. Introducing the notions of the global knowledge world and the knowledge society, the author presents the vision of the management of science as of an international task and one of development goals. He analyses the relationship of science and bureaucracy establishing a kind of a systematization for the decision making process related to science and explains his point of view that the global governance of science could be based on the activities of international bodies and structures of intergovernmental nature (IIGOs), most importantly of UN and UNESCO, and of non-governmental character (INGOs). Taking into account various aspects of internal and external management of science, the author points out that the global management of science appears to be a life necessity due to the growing need to jointly search for global scientific responses to the global problems, new risks and challenges that mankind is facing. In conclusion some ideas are expressed and proposals given how, in the author's opinion, to foster the goal of the global governance of science.

Related Content

Rania B. Mostafa, Hassan Naim Hannouf. © 2022. 18 pages.
Nur Özer Canarslan, Gülfidan Bariş. © 2022. 21 pages.
Cara Peters, Charles D. Bodkin. © 2022. 15 pages.
Anoop George, Manu Melwin Joy, Muhammed Sajid., Muhammed Nowfal S.. © 2022. 14 pages.
Raja Ahmed Jamil, Abdul Qayyum, Mohammad Saeed Lodhi. © 2022. 21 pages.
Heba Sadek. © 2021. 13 pages.
Bandar Khalaf Alharthey. © 2021. 25 pages.
Body Bottom