IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Collaboration Network Analysis Based on Normalized Citation Count and Eigenvector Centrality

Collaboration Network Analysis Based on Normalized Citation Count and Eigenvector Centrality
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Anand Bihari (National Institute of Technology Patna, Bihar, India), Sudhakar Tripathi (R. E. C. Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India)and Akshay Deepak (National Institute of Technology Patna, Bihar, India)
Copyright: 2019
Volume: 6
Issue: 1
Pages: 12
Source title: International Journal of Rough Sets and Data Analysis (IJRSDA)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Parikshit Narendra Mahalle (Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Bansilal Ramnath Agarwal Charitable Trust's, Vishwakarma Institute of Information Technology, India)
DOI: 10.4018/IJRSDA.2019010104

Purchase

View Collaboration Network Analysis Based on Normalized Citation Count and Eigenvector Centrality on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

In the research community, the estimation of the scholarly impact of an individual is based on either citation-based indicators or network centrality measures. The network-based centrality measures like degree, closeness, betweenness & eigenvector centrality and the citation-based indicators such as h-index, g-index & i10-index, etc., are used and all of the indicators give full credit to all of the authors of a particular article. This is although the contribution of the authors are different. To determine the actual contribution of an author in a particular article, we have applied arithmetic, geometric and harmonic counting methods for finding the actual contribution of an individual. To find the prominent actor in the network, we have applied eigenvector centrality. To authenticate the proposed analysis, an experimental study has been conducted on 186007 authors collaboration network, that is extracted from IEEE Xplore. The experimental results show that the geometric counting-based credit distribution among scholars gives better results than others.

Related Content

Tianlong Wang, Chaoyang Wang, Zhiqiang Liu, Shuai Ma, Huibo Yan. © 2024. 15 pages.
Xudong Cao, Chenchen Chen, Lejia Zhang, Li Pan. © 2024. 25 pages.
Shengfeng Xie, Jingwei Li. © 2024. 20 pages.
Xiaoyuan Wang, Hongfei Wang, Jianping Wang, Jiajia Wang. © 2024. 24 pages.
Jiao Hao, Zongbao Zhang, Yihan Ping. © 2024. 14 pages.
Qinmei Wang. © 2024. 13 pages.
Wenzhen Mai, Mohamud Saeed Ambashe, Chukwuka Christian Ohueri. © 2024. 18 pages.
Body Bottom