IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Transformative Potential of Constructivist Blended Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education

Transformative Potential of Constructivist Blended Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Roisin Donnelly (Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland)
Copyright: 2009
Pages: 21
Source title: Information Technology and Constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive Learning Frameworks
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Carla R. Payne (Union Institute and University of Vermont College, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-654-9.ch012

Purchase

View Transformative Potential of Constructivist Blended Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

This chapter critically explores the design and implementation of a blended problem-based learning (PBL) module for academic professional development in higher education. A core aspect of the chapter is the overview of the design framework used for the application and specific use of learning technologies in the PBL module. As it would appear that E-Learning courses are often lauded on the basis of their constructivist approach to learning, but in reality sustained inter-student contact and discussion can be difficult, an underlying purpose of the chapter is to show how interactional analysis helps in understanding the potential of transformative pedagogy within blended PBL. This chapter aims to highlight how emerging constructivist theories of learning may be applied to the blend of PBL and E-Learning. It addresses the need for an analysis of the interactions taking place in blended PBL with a specific focus on academic staff who are engaged in professional development in higher education in Ireland. It applies the relevant constructivist theories to the face-to-face PBL tutorials, online discussions, focus group interview texts and reflective papers generated over two years in a professional development module involving 17 academic staff. The chapter concludes with an analysis of the difference that the blended delivery made to both tutors and participants and discusses the design implications of a blended PBL model for the practice of academic development.

Related Content

Agah Tugrul Korucu, Handan Atun. © 2017. 18 pages.
Larisa Olesova, Jieun Lim. © 2017. 21 pages.
JoAnne Dalton Scott. © 2017. 20 pages.
Geraldine E Stirtz. © 2017. 25 pages.
Enilda Romero-Hall, Cristiane Rocha Vicentini. © 2017. 21 pages.
Beth Allred Oyarzun, Sheri Anderson Conklin, Daisyane Barreto. © 2017. 21 pages.
Nikolina Tsvetkova, Albena Antonova, Plama Hristova. © 2017. 24 pages.
Body Bottom