IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

The Wit-Learning Methodology as a Means for Research Skills Acquisition: A Longitudinal Assessment

The Wit-Learning Methodology as a Means for Research Skills Acquisition: A Longitudinal Assessment
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Luis Ibarra (Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico), Arturo Soriano (Tecnologico de Estudios Superiores de Ixtapaluca, Mexico), Pedro Ponce (Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico)and Arturo Molina (Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico)
Copyright: 2020
Pages: 27
Source title: Revolutionizing Education in the Age of AI and Machine Learning
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Maki K. Habib (The American University in Cairo, Egypt)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-7793-5.ch010

Purchase

View The Wit-Learning Methodology as a Means for Research Skills Acquisition: A Longitudinal Assessment on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

The present blistering modernization, epitomized by artificial intelligence, demands engineering graduates to address holistic, fast-changing, and even unknown problems. Thus, skills development, such as self-learning, is gaining importance against the traditional educational approach. To this regard, the wit-learning methodology was designed to stimulate the research skills during a course, supported on the similitude of the research endeavor with the desired engineers' profile. It stands out from other proposed alternatives targeting the students' capabilities that do not focus on research skills or misses their quantitative evaluation. In this chapter, the wit-learning methodology is presented together with its assessment regarding research skills acquisition, using direct and indirect measurements. Notably, it was verified to help improve the research skills through three criteria: the improvement of the students' research reports, the increased students' agreement to researchers while evaluating research reports, and their understanding of the research goals and processes.

Related Content

Maja Pucelj, Matjaž Mulej, Anita Hrast. © 2024. 29 pages.
Hemendra Singh. © 2024. 26 pages.
Nestor Soler del Toro. © 2024. 27 pages.
Pablo Banchio. © 2024. 18 pages.
Jože Ruparčič. © 2024. 26 pages.
Anuttama Ghose, Hartej Singh Kochher, S. M. Aamir Ali. © 2024. 28 pages.
Bhupinder Singh, Komal Vig, Pushan Kumar Dutta, Christian Kaunert, Bhupendra Kumar Gautam. © 2024. 23 pages.
Body Bottom