The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
The Observer's Paradox in Doctoral Ethnographic Fieldwork: Challenges and Solutions
Abstract
This article explores the observer's paradox as a persistent and deeply personal challenge in doctoral ethnographic fieldwork. Drawing on immersive research in a linguistically and ritually rich community, the author reflects on the tensions between presence and authenticity, access and ethics, and the evolving identity of the researcher. Through detailed narratives, the study traces the transformation from outsider to participant-observer, highlighting how tools such as notebooks and tape recorders simultaneously enable and disrupt the data collection process. The work underscores that the observer's paradox is not a methodological flaw to be eliminated but a relational condition to be acknowledged and navigated. By embracing uncertainty, practicing ethical reflexivity, and engaging in interpretive dialogue with participants, the researcher redefines validity not as objectivity but as accountability.
Related Content
|
Denise Demers, Carla Gilbreath.
© 2026.
24 pages.
|
|
Janet Acker.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Velmurugan R., Sudarvel J., Bhuvaneswari R., Ravi Thirumalaisamy.
© 2026.
18 pages.
|
|
Usharani Bhimavarapu.
© 2026.
24 pages.
|
|
Julasmin S. Kassim, Bonjovi H. Hajan, Shielamar J. Judan, Warda H. Hadjirul, Radzma J. Julhiji.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
Usharani Bhimavarapu.
© 2026.
24 pages.
|
|
Sepideh Mahani.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
|