The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Testing the Validity of the Post and Vote Model of Web-Based Peer Assessment
Abstract
Two tests of validity were conducted with undergraduate education students on a method of online peer assessment called post and vote. Validity was determined by calculating a Pearson product-moment correlation and corresponding coefficient of determination that compared the average grade assigned by the pre-service teachers with the grade assigned independently by the course instructor. Results of both studies showed that post and vote Web-based peer assessment was valid with these groups, and generalizable to undergraduate classes engaged in similar tasks.
Related Content
Natwaine Sherune Gardner, Kedon J. S. Luke, Andrew O. Wheatley, Winston De La Haye, Perceval Steven Bahado-Singh, Lowell L. Dilworth, Donovan A. McGrowder, Everard Barton, Lauriann E. Young-Martin, Ajibeke Salako-Akande, Henry Lowe, Errol Morrison, Denise Eldermire-Shearer, Helen Asemota.
© 2019.
21 pages.
|
Alessandro Massaro.
© 2019.
25 pages.
|
Sami D. Alaruri.
© 2019.
14 pages.
|
K. Vinoth Kumar, Prawin Angel Michael.
© 2019.
15 pages.
|
Nitin K. Mandavgade, Santosh B. Jaju, Ramesh R. Lakhe.
© 2019.
22 pages.
|
Madan Kumar Sharma, Mithilesh Kumar Kumar, Satya P. Singh.
© 2019.
21 pages.
|
Andreia de Lima Fioravante, Evelyn de Freitas Guimarães, Fabiano Barbieri Gonzaga, Cristiane Rodrigues Augusto, Claudia Cipriano Ribeiro, Eliane Cristina Pires do Rego, Elaine Batista de Santana, Laura Alves das Neves, Lucas Junqueira de Carvalho, Renato Rubim Ribeiro de Almeida, Rodrigo C. de Sena, Marcelo de Almeida Dominguez, Janaina Marques Rodrigues Caixeiro, Valnei Smarçaro da Cunha, Sidney P. Sobral.
© 2019.
20 pages.
|
|
|