The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Rigor in Grounded Theory Research: An Interpretive Perspective on Generating Theory from Qualitative Field Studies
Abstract
This chapter presents a set of principles for the use of Grounded Theory techniques in qualitative field studies. Some issues and controversies relating to rigor in Grounded Theory generation are discussed. These include: inductive theory generation and emergence, how theoretical saturation may be judged, the extent to which coding schemes should be formalized, the objectivist-subjectivist debate, and the assessment of quality and rigor in interpretive research. It is argued that Grounded Theory is often criticized for a lack of rigor because we apply positivist evaluations of rigor to research that derives from an interpretive worldview. Alternative assessments of rigor are suggested, that emphasize reflexivity in the inductive-deductive cycle of substantive theory generation.
Related Content
Yair Wiseman.
© 2021.
11 pages.
|
Mário Pereira Véstias.
© 2021.
15 pages.
|
Mahfuzulhoq Chowdhury, Martin Maier.
© 2021.
15 pages.
|
Gen'ichi Yasuda.
© 2021.
12 pages.
|
Alba J. Jerónimo, María P. Barrera, Manuel F. Caro, Adán A. Gómez.
© 2021.
19 pages.
|
Gregor Donaj, Mirjam Sepesy Maučec.
© 2021.
14 pages.
|
Udit Singhania, B. K. Tripathy.
© 2021.
11 pages.
|
|
|