The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
New Design Paradigm: Shaping and Employment
Abstract
The multiple shortcomings of the current Design paradigm manifest the need of its modification. Our objective was to find out an appropriate mechanism. But such a mechanism could not be revealed without assistance of a Design theory. The emergent dilemma – to use one of the available theories or develop a new one – was resolved by choosing the third way: rearrangement of the material at hand on modularity principles with initiation of fundamental (systemic) Design theory module via identification of its paradigm. While doing this, we had to overcome a number of delusions ingrained in engineering design, concerned firstly with design problem, process and design representation. To push these efforts forward, a scientific base named Continuous Process Theory had been developed. Systemic module initiation enabled to define a paradigm of the second Design theory module – the sought-for Design practice paradigm. Discussion on the outcomes of this definition rounds off this chapter.
Related Content
|
Poshan Yu, Zixuan Zhao, Emanuela Hanes.
© 2023.
29 pages.
|
|
Subramaniam Meenakshi Sundaram, Tejaswini R. Murgod, Madhu M. Nayak, Usha Rani Janardhan, Usha Obalanarasimhaiah.
© 2023.
20 pages.
|
|
Rekha R. Nair, Tina Babu, Kishore S..
© 2023.
23 pages.
|
|
Wasswa Shafik.
© 2023.
22 pages.
|
|
Jay Kumar Jain, Dipti Chauhan.
© 2023.
24 pages.
|
|
George Makropoulos, Dimitrios Fragkos, Harilaos Koumaras, Nancy Alonistioti, Alexandros Kaloxylos, Vaios Koumaras, Theoni Dounia, Christos Sakkas, Dimitris Tsolkas.
© 2023.
19 pages.
|
|
Shouvik Sanyal, Kalimuthu M., Thangaraja Arumugam, Aruna R., Balaji J., Ajitha Savarimuthu, Chandan Chavadi, Dhanabalan Thangam, Sendhilkumar Manoharan, Shasikala Patil.
© 2023.
17 pages.
|
|
|