IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Mobile Health Technology Evaluation: Innovativeness and Efficacy vs. Cost Effectiveness

Mobile Health Technology Evaluation: Innovativeness and Efficacy vs. Cost Effectiveness
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Sherina Idrish (North South University, Bangladesh), Afrin Rifat (North South University, Bangladesh), Mehree Iqbal (North South University, Bangladesh)and Nabila Nisha (North South University, Bangladesh)
Copyright: 2018
Pages: 22
Source title: Health Economics and Healthcare Reform: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3168-5.ch002

Purchase

View Mobile Health Technology Evaluation: Innovativeness and Efficacy vs. Cost Effectiveness on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Globally, the advancement of mobile technology and the growing number of mobile phone users has promoted the boom in mobile health services. The influence of mobile technology has, in fact, made healthcare delivery more accessible, affordable and effective today. Consumers are thus increasingly using mobile devices as health service delivery aids across various countries. However, questions remain as to how consumer traits like personal innovativeness and self-efficacy, financial costs related to the service delivery and demographics like age and gender may affect the usage and adoption of mobile health services, especially for emerging economies like Bangladesh. Conceptual model of the study identifies self-efficacy, facilitating conditions, effort expectancy and performance expectancy to be significant constructs that influences users' overall perceptions of mobile health services, along with moderating effects of both age and gender upon the selected factors. Finally, the study highlights managerial implications, future research directions and limitations.

Related Content

Emine Erden Kaya, Şeyma Eşki Çaylak. © 2024. 19 pages.
Emre Çıtak. © 2024. 17 pages.
Selçuk Efe Efe Küçükkambak. © 2024. 17 pages.
Aida Guliyeva, Ulviyya Rzayeva, Aslan Azimzadeh. © 2024. 28 pages.
Rebeca Jiménez-Rodríguez, Marcelo Sanchez. © 2024. 19 pages.
Mukesh Shankar Bharti. © 2024. 18 pages.
Ejazul Haq Ateed. © 2024. 20 pages.
Body Bottom