IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Does an Open Source Development Environment Facilitate Conventional Project Management Approaches and Collaborative Work?

Does an Open Source Development Environment Facilitate Conventional Project Management Approaches and Collaborative Work?
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Richard Garling (American Military University, USA)
Copyright: 2021
Pages: 18
Source title: Research Anthology on Usage and Development of Open Source Software
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Information Resources Management Association (USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9158-1.ch013

Purchase


Abstract

Open source software (OSS) is very well known for allowing free access to the source code of the application. The idea is to allow for the creation of a better product. The more people working to make each aspect of an application better, more minds create more ideas, create a better project. OSS runs the internet since all of the protocols—network time protocol (NTP), HTTP, amongst many others—are OSS projects with many years of use. These projects are run by volunteers worldwide. But, none of these projects are run using the traditional methodologies of project management: Waterfall and Agile. This chapter asks: How does an open source development environment facilitate conventional Waterfall project management approaches? and How does an open source development environment facilitate Agile project collaborative work? The method used to determine the answers used surveys and questionnaires involving actual participants in a variety of OSS projects from across the United States (US). The questions asked concerned the organization OSS projects, did they use a particular traditional methodology or some other non-defined method of organization? The answers received by this study centered on non-defined methods of organization; traditional methodologies were considered too restrictive and not agile enough to allow for the freedom cherished by their volunteers.

Related Content

Karl-Michael Popp. © 2023. 17 pages.
Marco Berlinguer. © 2023. 32 pages.
Laetitia Marie Thomas, Karine Evrard-Samuel, Peter Troxler. © 2023. 30 pages.
Renê de Souza Pinto. © 2023. 48 pages.
Francisco Jose Monaco. © 2023. 47 pages.
Marcelo Schmitt, Paulo Meirelles. © 2023. 25 pages.
Hillary Nyakundi, Cesar Henrique De Souza. © 2023. 39 pages.
Body Bottom