The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Digital "Evidence" is Often Evidence of Nothing
Abstract
Digital data increasingly presented in courts as evidence is mistakenly viewed by judges and juries as inherently unalterable. In fact, digital data can be very easily altered and it can be impossible for this falsification to be detected. A number of common ways are described whereby data in one’s computer can enter without the computer owner’s knowledge, let alone complicity. The same applies to all digital storage media, such as those used in digital cameras, digital “tape” recorders, digital divers’ computers, GPS “navigators”, and all other digital devices in common use today. It is important for judges and juries to be highly skeptical of any claims by prosecution that digital “evidence” proves anything at all.
Related Content
|
Vivek Bhardwaj, Bilal Ahmed, Mirza Shuja, Deepak Thakur, Tanya Gera, Mukesh Kumar.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Vivek Bhardwaj, Tanima Thakur, Mrinalini Rana, Jeyaganesh Viswanathan.
© 2026.
24 pages.
|
|
Abhishek Sharma, Abhishek Mishra, Shweta Jain, Khushboo Karodiya, Priyanka Sharma.
© 2026.
10 pages.
|
|
Akash Mishra, Nandini Bansod, Dinesh Baban Kamble.
© 2026.
18 pages.
|
|
Anjali Rawat, George Kurian, Romil Rawat, Janet Olivia Richmond, Anand Rajavat, Purvee Bhardwaj.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
Antonio Gonzalez-Torres.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Anjali Rawat, A. Samson Arun Raj, Janet Olivia Richmond, Anand Rajavat, Antonio González-Torres, Purvee Bhardwaj.
© 2026.
22 pages.
|
|
|