The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Comparing Effectiveness of E-Learning Training and Traditional Training in Industrial Safety and Health
|
|
Author(s): Norlinda Binti Mohd Rozar (University Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia), Abdullah Bin Ibrahim (Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia)and Muhammad Ashlyzan Bin Razik (Open University, KFORCE, & Politeknik sultan Haji Ahmad Shah, Malaysia)
Copyright: 2013
Pages: 16
Source title:
Transdisciplinary Marketing Concepts and Emergent Methods for Virtual Environments
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Hatem El-Gohary (Birmingham City University, UK & Cairo University Business School, Egypt)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-1861-9.ch015
Purchase
|
Abstract
In response to the demanding change in work environments, most companies not only depend on traditional training, but also on e-learning and emphasizing it in safety and health. The benefits and cost effectiveness of the benefits of e-learning training are trusted. Nevertheless, accidents still happen at the workplace. This has become an issue to be studied, especially on the effectiveness of e-learning training in comparison to traditional training. In this study, a framework to measure comparative effectiveness between these two learning environments was developed based on Kirkpatrick’s four-level evaluation model and a case study was applied to test all the levels of the framework. These four levels include participant reaction, learning, achievements, behavior of employees, and results. The interview results indicated that there is no difference in the rating of the effectiveness of the two training methods based on Kirkpatrick’s model.
Related Content
|
Albérico Travassos Rosário, Joana Carmo Dias.
© 2024.
35 pages.
|
|
Elena García-y-García, Francisco Rejón-Guardia, Laura Berenice Sánchez-Baltasar.
© 2024.
35 pages.
|
|
Nino Tchanturia, Rusudan Dalakishvili.
© 2024.
20 pages.
|
|
Žiga Domadenik, Tina Tomažič.
© 2024.
21 pages.
|
|
Loredana Kotinski.
© 2024.
14 pages.
|
|
Margarida Silva, Nataliia Buchko, Natalia Parashchenko, Titanilla Marta Szaszi, Yevheniia Tovstyk.
© 2024.
15 pages.
|
|
A. N. Raghavendra, G. Vijayakumar, Sanjeev Kumar Thalari.
© 2024.
16 pages.
|
|
|