The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Cognitive vs. Social Constructivist Learning for Research and Training on the Angoff Method
Abstract
This chapter aims to revitalize the use of the Angoff method in measuring students' performance in the educational contexts by offering guidance on the constructivist learning perspective that is more appropriate for training K-12 teachers. Specifically, it compares the cognitive and social constructivist theories and the Completely Structured Training (CST) and Partially Structured Training (PST) designs for conducting training on the Angoff method. The analysis argues for the relative efficacy of the cognitive constructivist perspective of the CST based on a breakdown of the cognitive strategies of the Angoff method judgments over the social constructivist perspective of the PST that emphasizes interpersonal interactions. The chapter concludes with recommendations for empirical comparisons of the quality of judgments based on the CST and PST models.
Related Content
|
Tutita M. Casa, Fabiana Cardetti, Madelyn W. Colonnese.
© 2024.
14 pages.
|
|
R. Alex Smith, Madeline Day Price, Tessa L. Arsenault, Sarah R. Powell, Erin Smith, Michael Hebert.
© 2024.
19 pages.
|
|
Marta T. Magiera, Mohammad Al-younes.
© 2024.
27 pages.
|
|
Christopher Dennis Nazelli, S. Asli Özgün-Koca, Deborah Zopf.
© 2024.
31 pages.
|
|
Ethan P. Smith.
© 2024.
22 pages.
|
|
James P. Bywater, Sarah Lilly, Jennifer L. Chiu.
© 2024.
20 pages.
|
|
Ian Jones, Jodie Hunter.
© 2024.
20 pages.
|
|
|