The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Beyond Science Fiction Tales
|
Author(s): Juan A. Barceló (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain)
Copyright: 2009
Pages: 27
Source title:
Computational Intelligence in Archaeology
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Juan A. Barcelo (Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-489-7.ch010
Purchase
|
Abstract
We have already argued that an automated archaeologist cannot understand past social actions by enumerating every possible outcome of every possible social action. The need to insert all the world within the automated archaeologist’s brain and then maintain every change about is impossible. However, if we cannot introduce the world inside the robot, we may introduce the robot inside the world. What the automated archaeologist would need then is to be situated in the past, and then using observation and attention to learn from human action, because of the complexities of the past, which resist modeling. It leads to a modification of the aphorism espoused by Rodney Brooks (1989): “the past itself should be its own best model.” Consequently, the automated archaeologist must travel to the past to be able to understand why it happened. Only by being situated directly in the past, the automated archaeologist would understand what someone did and why she did it there or elsewhere.
Related Content
Bhargav Naidu Matcha, Sivakumar Sivanesan, K. C. Ng, Se Yong Eh Noum, Aman Sharma.
© 2023.
60 pages.
|
Lavanya Sendhilvel, Kush Diwakar Desai, Simran Adake, Rachit Bisaria, Hemang Ghanshyambhai Vekariya.
© 2023.
15 pages.
|
Jayanthi Ganapathy, Purushothaman R., Ramya M., Joselyn Diana C..
© 2023.
14 pages.
|
Prince Rajak, Anjali Sagar Jangde, Govind P. Gupta.
© 2023.
14 pages.
|
Mustafa Eren Akpınar.
© 2023.
9 pages.
|
Sreekantha Desai Karanam, Krithin M., R. V. Kulkarni.
© 2023.
34 pages.
|
Omprakash Nayak, Tejaswini Pallapothala, Govind P. Gupta.
© 2023.
19 pages.
|
|
|