The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Benchmarking Steganalysis
|
|
Author(s): Andrew D. Ker (Oxford University Computing Laboratory, UK)
Copyright: 2009
Pages: 25
Source title:
Multimedia Forensics and Security
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Chang-Tsun Li (University of Warwick, UK)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-869-7.ch013
Purchase
|
Abstract
This chapter discusses how to evaluate the effectiveness of steganalysis techniques. In the steganalysis literature, numerous different methods are used to measure detection accuracy, with different authors using incompatible benchmarks. Thus it is difficult to make a fair comparison of competing steganalysis methods. This chapter argues that some of the choices for steganalysis benchmarks are demonstrably poor, either in statistical foundation or by over-valuing irrelevant areas of the performance envelope. Good choices of benchmark are highlighted, and simple statistical techniques demonstrated for evaluating the significance of observed performance differences. It is hoped that this chapter will make practitioners and steganalysis researchers better able to evaluate the quality of steganography detection methods.
Related Content
|
Vivek Bhardwaj, Bilal Ahmed, Mirza Shuja, Deepak Thakur, Tanya Gera, Mukesh Kumar.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Vivek Bhardwaj, Tanima Thakur, Mrinalini Rana, Jeyaganesh Viswanathan.
© 2026.
24 pages.
|
|
Abhishek Sharma, Abhishek Mishra, Shweta Jain, Khushboo Karodiya, Priyanka Sharma.
© 2026.
10 pages.
|
|
Akash Mishra, Nandini Bansod, Dinesh Baban Kamble.
© 2026.
18 pages.
|
|
Anjali Rawat, George Kurian, Romil Rawat, Janet Olivia Richmond, Anand Rajavat, Purvee Bhardwaj.
© 2026.
28 pages.
|
|
Antonio Gonzalez-Torres.
© 2026.
26 pages.
|
|
Anjali Rawat, A. Samson Arun Raj, Janet Olivia Richmond, Anand Rajavat, Antonio González-Torres, Purvee Bhardwaj.
© 2026.
22 pages.
|
|
|