IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Bayesian Agencies in Control

Bayesian Agencies in Control
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Anet Potgieter (University of Pretoria, South Africa)and Judith Bishop (University of Pretoria, South Africa)
Copyright: 2003
Pages: 14
Source title: Computational Intelligence in Control
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Masoud Mohammadian (University of Canberra, Australia), Rahul A. Sarker (University of New South Wales, Australia)and Xin Yao (The University of Birmingham, UK)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-037-0.ch010

Purchase

View Bayesian Agencies in Control on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Most agent architectures implement autonomous agents that use extensive interaction protocols and social laws to control interactions in order to ensure that the correct behaviors result during run-time. These agents, organized into multi-agent systems in which all agents adhere to predefined interaction protocols, are well suited to the analysis, design and implementation of complex systems in environments where it is possible to predict interactions during the analysis and design phases. In these multi-agent systems, intelligence resides in individual autonomous agents, rather than in the collective behavior of the individual agents. These agents are commonly referred to as “next-generation” or intelligent components, which are difficult to implement using current component-based architectures. In most distributed environments, such as the Internet, it is not possible to predict interactions during analysis and design. For a complex system to be able to adapt in such an uncertain and non-deterministic environment, we propose the use of agencies, consisting of simple agents, which use probabilistic reasoning to adapt to their environment. Our agents collectively implement distributed Bayesian networks, used by the agencies to control behaviors in response to environmental states. Each agency is responsible for one or more behaviors, and the agencies are structured into heterarchies according to the topology of the underlying Bayesian networks. We refer to our agents and agencies as “Bayesian agents” and “Bayesian agencies.”

Related Content

Bhargav Naidu Matcha, Sivakumar Sivanesan, K. C. Ng, Se Yong Eh Noum, Aman Sharma. © 2023. 60 pages.
Lavanya Sendhilvel, Kush Diwakar Desai, Simran Adake, Rachit Bisaria, Hemang Ghanshyambhai Vekariya. © 2023. 15 pages.
Jayanthi Ganapathy, Purushothaman R., Ramya M., Joselyn Diana C.. © 2023. 14 pages.
Prince Rajak, Anjali Sagar Jangde, Govind P. Gupta. © 2023. 14 pages.
Mustafa Eren Akpınar. © 2023. 9 pages.
Sreekantha Desai Karanam, Krithin M., R. V. Kulkarni. © 2023. 34 pages.
Omprakash Nayak, Tejaswini Pallapothala, Govind P. Gupta. © 2023. 19 pages.
Body Bottom