IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Automation of Marginal Grass Harvesting: Operational, Economic, and Environmental Analysis

Automation of Marginal Grass Harvesting: Operational, Economic, and Environmental Analysis
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Paulo Peças (Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal), Gonçalo Manuel Fonseca (Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal), Inês Inês Ribeiro (Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal)and Claus Grøn Sørensen (Aarhus University, Denmark)
Copyright: 2019
Pages: 41
Source title: Smart Farming Technologies for Sustainable Agricultural Development
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Ramesh C. Poonia (Amity University Jaipur, India), Xiao-Zhi Gao (University of Eastern Finland, Finland), Linesh Raja (Amity University Jaipur, India), Sugam Sharma (Iowa State University, USA)and Sonali Vyas (Amity University Jaipur, India)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5909-2.ch006

Purchase

View Automation of Marginal Grass Harvesting: Operational, Economic, and Environmental Analysis on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

In the European Union (EU), the use of fossil fuels brings several disadvantages, as they are the main culprits responsible for pollutants and GHG emissions. The increasing demand for sustainable fuels leads to the research of alternative technologies, such as biogas production from lignocellulosic materials. Therefore, the acquisition of biomass from marginal areas under Danish conditions has been evaluated in terms of alternative harvesting equipment: an automated robot (Grassbot) versus a regular tractor for key grass materials used for biogas plants (chopped, unchopped, and baled grass) and compared regarding operational, economical, and environmental performances. The evaluation uses two operations models (IRIS and DRIFT) to consider the field characteristics, machinery characteristics, etc. Selected results show that in terms of fuel consumption, chopping, and mowing are the most demanding operations, and that there is no significant difference between the harvesting equipment regarding CO2 emissions.

Related Content

Muhammad Asim, Aamir Raza, Muhammad Safdar, Mian Muhammad Ahmed, Amman Khokhar, Mohd Aarif, Mohammed Saleh Al Ansari, Jaffar Sattar, Ishtiaq Uz Zaman Chowdhury. © 2024. 26 pages.
Mian Muhammad Ahmed, Umer Sharif, Aamir Raza, Muhammad Safdar, Waqar Ali, Muhammad Asim, Hafsa Muzammal, Jaffar Sattar, Sheraz Maqbool, Malaika Zaheer. © 2024. 24 pages.
James Kanyepe, Tinashe Musasa, Katlego Mahupa Ketlhaetse, Brave Zizhou. © 2024. 29 pages.
Mohamed Salah El Din, Masengu Reason. © 2024. 25 pages.
Blessing Hodzi, Neil Batsirai Maheve. © 2024. 19 pages.
Joshua Risiro, Divaries Cosmas Jaravaza, Paul Mukucha. © 2024. 27 pages.
Option Takunda Chiwaridzo, Rodwell Musiiwa, Tariro Hlasi. © 2024. 26 pages.
Body Bottom