IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Applying NLP Metrics to Students’ Self-Explanations

Applying NLP Metrics to Students’ Self-Explanations
View Sample PDF
Author(s): G. Tanner Jackson (Arizona State University, USA)and Danielle S. McNamara (Arizona State University, USA)
Copyright: 2012
Pages: 15
Source title: Applied Natural Language Processing: Identification, Investigation and Resolution
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Philip M. McCarthy (The University of Memphis, USA)and Chutima Boonthum-Denecke (Hampton University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60960-741-8.ch015

Purchase

View Applying NLP Metrics to Students’ Self-Explanations on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) are becoming an increasingly common method for students to engage with and learn course material. ITSs are designed to provide students with one-on-one learning that is tailored to their own pace and needs. These systems can adapt to each users’ individual knowledge and ability level to provide the most pedagogically effective learning environment. Tutoring systems have been designed that cover a variety of topics, including both well-defined and ill-defined domains. ITSs have seen great success within well-defined domains, where the topic itself provides only a limited set of responses. For example, in the domain of algebra, there is a limited set of possible actions that can be performed to solve for an unknown variable. Knowing this complete set of actions allows the tutoring system to predict all possible responses from the user. In contrast, ill-defined domains are more abstract and open ended. Reading comprehension is an ill-defined, open ended domain that can incorporate text from any subject, and involve numerous processes and problems for the learner. The number of associations that learners can make with a given text (e.g., based on personal memories, previous courses, ideas within different parts of the same text, etc.) is virtually infinite. These associations make it almost impossible to predict how a user will respond to a text. In addition to working with more abstract concepts, ITSs within ill-defined domains often have the added challenge of interpreting natural language user input. Incorporating natural language allows learners to use their own words and ideas as they interact with the content; however, this also increases the ambiguity of the interaction and decreases the system’s ability to build a precise model of the learner. Building an accurate learner model is essential for the system to adapt the interaction in a pedagogically appropriate manner.

Related Content

Reinaldo Padilha França, Ana Carolina Borges Monteiro, Rangel Arthur, Yuzo Iano. © 2021. 21 pages.
Abdul Kader Saiod, Darelle van Greunen. © 2021. 28 pages.
Aswini R., Padmapriya N.. © 2021. 22 pages.
Zubeida Khan, C. Maria Keet. © 2021. 21 pages.
Neha Gupta, Rashmi Agrawal. © 2021. 20 pages.
Kamalendu Pal. © 2021. 14 pages.
Joy Nkechinyere Olawuyi, Bernard Ijesunor Akhigbe, Babajide Samuel Afolabi, Attoh Okine. © 2021. 19 pages.
Body Bottom