IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Application of Statistical Modelling and Evolutionary Optimization Tools in Resin-Bonded Molding Sand System

Application of Statistical Modelling and Evolutionary Optimization Tools in Resin-Bonded Molding Sand System
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Ganesh R. Chate (K. L. S. Gogte Institute of Technology, India), Manjunath Patel G. C. (Sahyadri College of Engineering and Management, India), Mahesh B. Parappagoudar (Padre Conceicao College of Engineering, India)and Anand S. Deshpande (K. L. S. Gogte Institute of Technology, India)
Copyright: 2018
Pages: 30
Source title: Handbook of Research on Investigations in Artificial Life Research and Development
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Maki Habib (The American University in Cairo, Egypt)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5396-0.ch007

Purchase

View Application of Statistical Modelling and Evolutionary Optimization Tools in Resin-Bonded Molding Sand System on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Trial-and-error methods in foundries to determine optimum molding sand properties consume more time and result in reduced productivity, high rejection, and cost. Hence, current research is focused towards development and application of modelling and optimization tools. In foundry, there is requirement of mound properties with conflicting nature (that is, minimize: gas evolution and collapsibility; maximize: compression strength, mound hardness, and permeability) and determining best combination among them is often a difficult task. Optimization of resin-bonded molding sand system is discussed in this book chapter. Six different case studies are considered by assigning different combination of weight fractions for multiple objective functions and corresponding desirability (Do) values are determined for DFA, GA, PSO, and MOPSO-CD. The obtained highest desirability value is considered as the optimum solution. Better performance of non-traditional tools might be due to parallel computing approach. GA and PSO have yielded almost similar results, whereas MOPSO-CD produced better results.

Related Content

Bhargav Naidu Matcha, Sivakumar Sivanesan, K. C. Ng, Se Yong Eh Noum, Aman Sharma. © 2023. 60 pages.
Lavanya Sendhilvel, Kush Diwakar Desai, Simran Adake, Rachit Bisaria, Hemang Ghanshyambhai Vekariya. © 2023. 15 pages.
Jayanthi Ganapathy, Purushothaman R., Ramya M., Joselyn Diana C.. © 2023. 14 pages.
Prince Rajak, Anjali Sagar Jangde, Govind P. Gupta. © 2023. 14 pages.
Mustafa Eren Akpınar. © 2023. 9 pages.
Sreekantha Desai Karanam, Krithin M., R. V. Kulkarni. © 2023. 34 pages.
Omprakash Nayak, Tejaswini Pallapothala, Govind P. Gupta. © 2023. 19 pages.
Body Bottom