The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
An Adaptive Feedback Framework to Support Reflection, Guiding and Tutoring
|
|
Author(s): Evangelia Gouli (University of Athens, Greece), Agoritsa Gogoulou (University of Athens, Greece), Kyparisia A. Papanikolaou (University of Athens, Greece)and Maria Grigoriadou (University of Athens, Greece)
Copyright: 2008
Pages: 19
Source title:
End-User Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications
Source Author(s)/Editor(s): Steve Clarke (University of Hull Business School, UK)
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-945-8.ch042
Purchase
|
Abstract
In this chapter, an adaptive feedback framework (AFF) is proposed for the provision of personalized feedback accommodating learners’ individual characteristics and needs in the context of computer-based learning environments. Multiple informative, tutoring, and reflective feedback components (ITRFC) are incorporated into the framework, aiming to stimulate learners to reflect on their beliefs, to guide and tutor them towards the achievement of specific learning outcomes and to inform them about their performance. The proposed framework adopts a scheme for the categorization of learners’ answer, introduces a multi-layer structure and a stepwise presentation of the ITRFC and supports adaptation of the provided feedback both in the dimensions of adaptivity and adaptability. The adaptivity of the AFF is based on the gradual provision of the ITRFC and on the adaptive presentation of the ITRFC according to the learner’s knowledge level, preferences and interaction behaviour. The adaptability of the AFF enables learners to have control over the feedback presentation in order to guide the adaptive dimension of the framework. In the context of the Web-based concept map assessment tool referred to as COMPASS, the proposed framework has been adopted for the provision of personalized feedback in concept mapping tasks. A preliminary evaluation of the framework in the context of COMPASS showed that the AFF led the majority of the learners in reviewing their maps, reconsidering their beliefs and accomplishing successfully the underlying concept mapping task.
Related Content
|
Rod D. Roscoe, Russell J. Branaghan, Nancy J. Cooke, Scotty D. Craig.
© 2018.
34 pages.
|
|
Steve Ritter, R. Charles Murray, Robert G. M. Hausmann.
© 2018.
17 pages.
|
|
Yvonne S. Kao, Bryan J. Matlen, Michelle Tiu, Linlin Li.
© 2018.
24 pages.
|
|
Melissa L. Stone, Kevin M. Kent, Rod D. Roscoe, Kathleen M. Corley, Laura K. Allen, Danielle S. McNamara.
© 2018.
23 pages.
|
|
Elizabeth R. Kazakoff, Melissa Orkin, Kristine Bundschuh, Rachel L. Schechter.
© 2018.
24 pages.
|
|
Irfan Kula, Russell J. Branaghan, Robert K. Atkinson, Rod D. Roscoe.
© 2018.
17 pages.
|
|
Erin Walker, Ruth Wylie, Andreea Danielescu, James P. Rodriguez III, Ed Finn.
© 2018.
19 pages.
|
|
|