The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Sexbots: Sex Slaves, Vulnerable Others or Perfect Partners?
|
|
Author(s): Robin Mackenzie (Law School, Eliot College, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK)
Copyright: 2018
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
Pages: 17
Source title:
International Journal of Technoethics (IJT)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Steven Umbrello (Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, University of Turin, Italy)
DOI: 10.4018/IJT.2018010101
Purchase
|
Abstract
This article describes how sexbots: sentient, self-aware, feeling artificial moral agents created soon as customised potential sexual/intimate partners provoke crucial questions for technoethics. Coeckelbergh's model of human/robotic relations as co-evolving to their mutual benefit through mutual vulnerability is applied to sexbots. As sexbots have a sustainable claim to moral standing, benefits and vulnerabilities inherent in human/sexbots relations must be identified and addressed for both parties. Humans' and sexbots' vulnerabilities are explored, drawing on the philosophy and social science of dehumanisation and inclusion/exclusion. This article argues humans as creators owe a duty of care to sentient beings they create. Responsible innovation practices involving stakeholders debating ethicolegal conundrums pertaining to human duties to sexbots, and sexbots' putative interests, rights and responsibilities are essential. These validate the legal recognition of sexbots, the protection of their interests through regulatory oversight and ethical limitations on customisation which must be put in place.
Related Content
|
Robert Keefer, Nadav Zohar, Lisa J. Douglas.
© 2024.
13 pages.
|
|
.
© 2024.
|
|
.
© 2024.
|
|
Charlene Hinton.
© 2023.
15 pages.
|
|
Alice Watanabe.
© 2023.
15 pages.
|
|
Roxanne van der Puil, Andreas Spahn, Lambèr Royakkers.
© 2023.
20 pages.
|
|
Lu Kong, Jihua Li.
© 2022.
11 pages.
|
|
|