IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

Large-Scale Co-Phylogenetic Analysis on the Grid

Large-Scale Co-Phylogenetic Analysis on the Grid
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Heinz Stockinger (Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Switzerland), Alexander F. Auch (University of Tübingen, Germany), Markus Göker (University of Tübingen, Germany), Jan Meier-Kolthoff (University of Tübingen, Germany) and Alexandros Stamatakis (Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany)
Copyright: 2009
Volume: 1
Issue: 1
Pages: 16
Source title: International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing (IJGHPC)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Emmanuel Udoh (Sullivan University, USA), Ching-Hsien Hsu (Chung Hua University, Taiwan) and Mohammad Khan (Sullivan University, USA)
DOI: 10.4018/jghpc.2009010104

Purchase

View Large-Scale Co-Phylogenetic Analysis on the Grid on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

Phylogenetic data analysis represents an extremely compute-intensive area of Bioinformatics and thus requires high-performance technologies. Another compute- and memory-intensive problem is that of hostparasite co-phylogenetic analysis: given two phylogenetic trees, one for the hosts (e.g., mammals) and one for their respective parasites (e.g., lice) the question arises whether host and parasite trees are more similar to each other than expected by chance alone. CopyCat is an easy-to-use tool that allows biologists to conduct such co-phylogenetic studies within an elaborate statistical framework based on the highly optimized sequential and parallel A xParafit program. We have developed enhanced versions of these tools that efficiently exploit a Grid environment and therefore facilitate large-scale data analyses. Furthermore, we developed a freely accessible client tool that provides co-phylogenetic analysis capabilities. Since the computational bulk of the problem is embarrassingly parallel, it fits well to a computational Grid and reduces the response time of large scale analyses.

Related Content

Streaming Remote Sensing Data Processing for the Future Smart Cities: State of the Art and Future Challenges
Xihuang Sun, Peng Liu, Yan Ma, Dingsheng Liu, Yechao Sun. © 2016. 14 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
City Data Fusion: Sensor Data Fusion in the Internet of Things
Meisong Wang, Charith Perera, Prem Prakash Jayaraman, Miranda Zhang, Peter Strazdins, R.K. Shyamsundar, Rajiv Ranjan. © 2016. 22 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Applying Security to a Big Stream Cloud Architecture for the Internet of Things
Laura Belli, Simone Cirani, Luca Davoli, Gianluigi Ferrari, Lorenzo Melegari, Marco Picone. © 2016. 22 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
SONATA: Social Network Assisted Trustworthiness Assurance in Smart City Crowdsensing
Burak Kantarci, Kevin G. Carr, Connor D. Pearsall. © 2016. 20 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
User Interaction with Linked Data: An Exploratory Search Approach
Dhavalkumar Thakker, Fan Yang-Turner, Dimoklis Despotakis. © 2016. 13 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Architectural Pattern for Scheduling Multi-Component Applications in Distributed Systems
Absalom El-Shamir Ezugwu, Marc Eduard Frincu, Sahalu Balarabe Junaidu. © 2016. 22 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Interflow Network Coding Approaches for Data Heterogeneous Unicast Sessions in Wireless Networks
Tuan Tran, Emmanuel Udoh, Tung Nguyen. © 2016. 15 pages.
View Details View Details PDF Full Text View Sample PDF
Body Bottom