The IRMA Community
Newsletters
Research IRM
Click a keyword to search titles using our InfoSci-OnDemand powered search:
|
Comparision Between Features of CbO based Algorithms for Generating Formal Concepts
Abstract
Formal Concept Analysis provides the mathematical notations for representing concepts and concept hierarchies making use of order and lattice theory. This has now been used in numerous applications which include software engineering, linguistics, sociology, information sciences, information technology, genetics, biology and in engineering. The algorithms derived from Kustenskov's CbO were found to provide the most efficient means of computing formal concepts in several research papers. In this paper key enhancements to the original CbO algorithms are discussed in detail. The effects of these key features are presented in both isolation and combination. Eight different variations of the CbO algorithms highlighting the key features were compared in a level playing field by presenting them using the same notation and implementing them from the notation in the same way. The three main enhancements considered are the partial closure with incremental closure of intents, inherited canonicity test failures and using a combined depth first and breadth first search. The algorithms were implemented in an un-optimized way to focus on the comparison on the algorithms themselves and not on any efficiencies provided by optimizing code. The main contribution of this paper is the complete comparison of the three main enhancements used in recent variations of the CbO based algorithms. The main findings were that there is a significant performance improvement partial closure with incremental closure of intents is used in isolation. However, there is no significant performance improvement when the depth and breadth first search or the inherited canonicity test failure feature is used in isolation. The inherited canonicity test failure needs to be combined with the combined depth and breadth first feature to obtain a performance increase. Combining all the three enhancements brought the best performance.
Related Content
|
Li Liao.
© 2024.
16 pages.
|
|
Shuqin Zhang, Peiyu Shi, Tianhui Du, Xinyu Su, Yunfei Han.
© 2024.
27 pages.
|
|
Jinming Zhou, Yuanyuan Zhan, Sibo Chen.
© 2024.
29 pages.
|
|
G. Manikandan, Reuel Samuel Sam, Steven Frederick Gilbert, Karthik Srikanth.
© 2024.
16 pages.
|
|
Liangqun Yang.
© 2024.
17 pages.
|
|
V. Shanmugarajeshwari, M. Ilayaraja.
© 2024.
22 pages.
|
|
Kaisheng Liu.
© 2024.
21 pages.
|
|
|