IRMA-International.org: Creator of Knowledge
Information Resources Management Association
Advancing the Concepts & Practices of Information Resources Management in Modern Organizations

An Analysis of Pecking Order Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process

An Analysis of Pecking Order Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process
View Sample PDF
Author(s): Hakan Altin (University of Aksaray, Turkey)
Copyright: 2022
Volume: 9
Issue: 1
Pages: 18
Source title: International Journal of Applied Management Sciences and Engineering (IJAMSE)
Editor(s)-in-Chief: Carolina Machado (University of Minho, Portugal)and J. Paulo Davim (University of Aveiro, Portugal)
DOI: 10.4018/IJAMSE.295865

Purchase

View An Analysis of Pecking Order Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process on the publisher's website for pricing and purchasing information.

Abstract

According to pecking order theory (POT), when a company feels the need for capital, it applies the hierarchies of accounts payable and accruals, retained earnings, debt, and new common stock. Similarly, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method calculates the hierarchical priorities for the solution of complex problems. The most important justification explaining the hierarchy implementation of the POT approach are the impacts of asymmetrical information and signaling. Similarly, in the AHP method, the hierarchical decision-making process depends on the justification of the decision maker. The existence of asymmetrical information shows that the two methods complete each other. The aim of the study was to analyze POT with the AHP method, in other words, an examination of the consistency of the POT and AHP approaches with each other. The results showed that the two methods are indeed consistent with each other.

Related Content

Joana Neves, Miguel Cachulo Pereira. © 2025. 14 pages.
Manuel Escourido-Calvo, A. Javier Prado-Dominguez, Federico Martin-Palmero. © 2025. 23 pages.
Uday Kumar Ghosh, Whitney Taylor, Yahya Ghaith. © 2025. 28 pages.
Muhammet Başar, Aytaç Gökmen. © 2024. 16 pages.
Efigenia Madalena Mario Semente, Ricartha B. Haragaes. © 2024. 23 pages.
Stanley Sebastian Cloete, Efigenia Madalena Mario Semente. © 2024. 24 pages.
Brian J. Galli, Fuwei Qiu. © 2023. 9 pages.
Body Bottom